Wednesday, 17 July 2013

Google Glass

What is Google Glass?

Google Glass is an attempt to free data from desktop computers and portable devices like phones and tablets, and place it right in front of your eyes.
Essentially, Google Glass is a camera, display, touchpad, battery and microphone built into spectacle frames so that you can perch a display in your field of vision, film, take pictures, search and translate on the go.
The principle is one that has been around for years in science fiction, and more recently it's become a slightly clunky reality. In fact, the "heads-up display" putting data in your field of vision became a reality as early as 1900 when the reflector sight was invented.


Google Glass uses display technology instead to put data in front (or at least, to the upper right) of your vision courtesy of a prism screen. This is designed to be easily seen without obstructing your view. According to Google the display is "the equivalent of a 25-inch high definition screen from eight feet away". There's no official word on native resolution, but 640 x 360 has been widely mooted.
Overlaying data into your vision has obvious benefits; many of which are already functional in Google Glass. Directions become more intuitive (although it sounds like there is no GPS on board so you will have to pair it with your phone), you can view real-time translations or transcriptions of what is being said, and you can scroll through and reply to messages - all on the fly.

What can Google Glass do?

As well as Google's own list of features, the early apps for Google Glass provide a neat glimpse into the potential of the headset.
As well as photos and film - which require no explanation - you can use the Google hangout software to video conference with your friends and show them what you're looking at.
You'll also be able to use Google Maps to get directions, although with GPS absent from the spec list, you'll need to tether Glass to your phone.

Google has given its Glass project a big boost by snapping up voice specialists DNN research. To do that, Google offers the MyGlass app. This pairs your headset with an Android phone. As well as sharing GPS data, this means messages can be received, viewed on the display, and answered using the microphone and Google's voice-to-text functionality.
That functionality will also bring the ability to translate the words being spoken to you into your own language on the display. Obviously you'll need a WiFi connection or a hefty data plan if you're in another country, but it's certainly a neat trick if it works.
Third parties are also already developing some rather cool/scary apps for Google Glass - including one that allows you to identify your friends in a crowd, and another that allows you to dictate an email.
The New York Times app gives an idea how news will be displayed when it's asked for: a headline, byline, appropriate image and number of hours since the article was published are displayed.

What are the Google Glass specifications?

As well as a mooted 640 x 360 display, the built-in camera is a 5MP snapper that can film at 720p.
Battery life is apparently a day, although that's with the usual "typical use" caveat, which probably excludes a lot of videoing.
There's 16GB of flash memory built into the device, although only 12GB will be available for user storage. The device will sync to your Google Drive in the cloud
Bluetooth and WiFi will be built in, but no GPS chip - so the Glass will probably work best alongside an Android phone, although you can pair with any Bluetooth enabled phone.
The frame will come with replacement and adjustable nosepads, and is expected to be both lightweight and extremely robust. It will also have a touchpad along one arm.
The sound will be produced through bone conduction transfer - vibrating your skull to transmit to your ears.
There is a Micro USB cable and charger for the dev versions, and all of the above specs are expected to be replicated in the consumer versions when they arrive.
Lastly, Google Glass will come in five colours: Charcoal, Tangerine, Shale, Cotton and Sky. Using Glass's translation ability to turn that list from marketing speak to plain English, that's black, orange, grey, white and blue.


What's the Google Glass price?

The Google Glass Explorer (the developer version being sent out now) costs $1,500 - around £985 or AU$1,449 or INR 90000.
The consumer versions, which are expected to arrive by the end of 2013, are expected to be a little cheaper, although any actual prices remain speculative. They are unlikely to be super-cheap - but Google's success with the Nexus 7 tablet may prompt the company to subsidise some of the cost.

When is the Google Glass release date?

A final release date has not been announced, but sources tell us that the original suggestion of 2014 was actually overly pessimistic and we could see Google Glass arrive in time for the end of 2013. So start readying your letter to Santa.


I already wear glasses. Will Google Glasses work for me?
Yes - Google is already working on designer versions which will include prescription lenses.

Who is providing the competition?

Of course, with something as high profile as Google Glass, every major company has been linked with building a competitor.
Apple and Microsoft are Google's most obvious rivals - and both are rumoured to be working on their own equivalents. Sony has gone so far as to patent a Glass-alike offering. Vuzix, Oakley and Baidu are other numbered among the potential Glass rivals, and they won't be the last. Indeed, one Taiwanese manufacturer Oculon are readying a cheaper, higher spec'ed (ahem) version.

So, Be Prepared for the FUTURE of Technology !! Google Glasses...

Monday, 24 June 2013

Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom

Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom

Just taking the photo won't do these days - you'll want to edit and share it, then rake in the likes. Except most cameras pretty much bail out at the snapshot. Not the Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom though, a hybrid of a point-and-shoot with 10x optical zoom and a Galaxy S4 mini. This is Samsung's second such attempt after the Galaxy Camera, which was based on the Galaxy S III.
   
Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom official photos
The Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom has full telephony features (unlike the Camera), but it's not the most comfortable phone around. Photography is the full-time job here.
A 10x zoom lens with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) sits in front of a 16MP sensor. At the wide end, the lens is the very wide 24mm in 35mm equivalent, the aperture goes from f/3.1 to f/6.3 and there's a mechanical shutter. The Galaxy S4 zoom has a control ring around the lens like some high-end point-and-shoots do, a xenon flash and LED light.
That's just the camera specs, the rest is a full-featured Galaxy S4 mini hardware, including the IR blaster, which can control a projector (the one, most likely, you'd use to show off your photos).

Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom at a glance:

  • General: GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz; UMTS 850/900/1900/2100 MHz, HSDPA 21 Mbps, HSUPA 5.76 Mbps; LTE (market dependent), Cat3, 50 Mbps UL, 100 Mbps DL
  • Form factor: Touchscreen bar phone with optical zoom lens
  • Dimensions: 125.5 x 63.5 x 15.4 mm, 208 g
  • Display: 4.25" 16M-color qHD (540 x 960 pixels) Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen
  • CPU: Dual-core Cortex-A9 1.5 GHz processor, 1.5GB RAM, Mali-400 GPU
  • OS: Android 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
  • Memory: 8 GB (5 GB user available) of inbuilt storage, microSD card slot
  • Still Camera: 16 megapixel auto-focus camera with 10x optical zoom and Optical Image Stabilization; xenon flash and LED light; control lens ring
  • Video Camera: Full HD (1080p) video recording at 30fps; 720p @ 60fps
  • Connectivity: Dual-band Wi-Fi a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi hotspot, Bluetooth 4.0+HS, NFC, MHL-enabled standard microUSB port, GPS receiver with A-GPS and GLONASS, 3.5mm audio jack, FM radio, USB-on-the-go
  • Battery: 2,330mAh
  • Misc: TouchWiz 5.0 Nature UX, XviD codec support, built-in accelerometer, multi-touch input, proximity sensor, gyroscope sensor, smart screen
There are some differences between the Galaxy S4 zoom and the mini but, outside the size, those are insignificant. The chipset is powerful enough to shoot 1080p video at 30fps and 720p at 60fps (same as the Galaxy Camera). Samsung has made sure too that the default camera app is the most advanced we've seen yet, and there are a number of helpful image and video editors among other tools.
Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom Sm C1010 Preview Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom Sm C1010 Preview Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom Sm C1010 Preview Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom Sm C1010 Preview
With Android 4.2 you'd be able to install other editors and camera apps too (though these will have to add support for the optical zoom feature). Not to mention all the social networking and other tools for sharing your photos, which can be piped through blazing fast LTE or Wi-Fi, DLNA, MHL or Group Play.

Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

Add together the brawn of the Xcover and the brains of a Galaxy S4 and you get the S4 Active. The actual flagship can handle any digital task you throw at it, but the Active version can cope with the grittier side of life. The Samsung Galaxy S4 Active is IP67-certified for water and dust protection.
Samsung I9295 Galaxy S4 Active Preview Samsung I9295 Galaxy S4 Active Preview Samsung I9295 Galaxy S4 Active Preview Samsung I9295 Galaxy S4 Active Preview
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active official images
Up to a meter of water for up to 30 minutes - that's the same level of water resistance as the Sony Xperia Z, a phone that often got mentioned for being in the unique position of combining premium features and rugged design. Now it has to share the limelight though.
Before we dive into the specs, we should mention that the Samsung Galaxy S4 Active has almost the exact same specs as the regular model, unlike the various Galaxy S minis and such that share in the flagship name to only offer midrange specs.

Samsung Galaxy S4 Active at a glance:

  • General: Quad-band 2G/quad-band 3G/LTE connectivity
  • Form factor: Water resistant touchscreen bar phone, I657 certification
  • Dimensions: 139.7 x 71.3 x 9.1 mm, 151 g
  • Display: 5" 16M-color TFT LCD capacitive touchscreen with a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels (441ppi); Glove touch
  • Chipset: Snapdragon 600
  • CPU: 1.9GHz Krait 300
  • GPU: Adreno 320
  • RAM: 2GB
  • OS: Android 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
  • Memory: 16GB storage, microSD card slot
  • Still camera: 8 megapixel auto-focus camera, face detection, touch focus and image stabilization, Cinema Photo; 2MP front facing camera, video-calls
  • Video camera: Full HD (1080p) video recording at 30fps
  • Connectivity: Wi-Fi a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi hotspot, Bluetooth 4.0, standard microUSB port with MHL features (TV Out, USB host), GPS receiver with A-GPS and GLONASS, 3.5mm audio jack, NFC, Infrared port
  • Battery: Removable 2600mAh
  • Misc: TouchWiz UI, Impressively rich video/audio codec support, built-in accelerometer, Smart stay and Smart rotation eye-tracking, Smart pause, Smart scroll, S Health, Air Gestures
The two downgrades here are the screen (LCD instead of Super AMOLED) and the main camera (down to 8MP from 13MP). The rest is in place though - the blazing fast chipset, the removable battery and expandable storage (two things often sacrificed in the name of water tightness), even things like Air Gestures and the IR remote control functionality are intact.
Samsung I9295 Galaxy S4 Active Preview Samsung I9295 Galaxy S4 Active Preview Samsung I9295 Galaxy S4 Active Preview Samsung I9295 Galaxy S4 Active Preview
So, how is the Samsung Galaxy S4 Active better than a regular S4 in a rugged case? It's not that different, though the phone is more compact than a third-party add-on can ever be and we actually quite like the different styling (Samsung's lineup is getting a little stale design-wise).

Thursday, 20 June 2013

Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One


Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One





CPU
Faster CPU clock speed8x 1.6 GHzvs4x 1.7 GHz1.88x faster CPU clock speed.
CAMERA
Distinctly more megapixel (photo)13 MPvs4 MP3.25x more megapixel (photo).
Has continuous autofocus when recording moviesYesvsNoWhen recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
Has a CMOS sensorYesvsNoThe CMOS sensor captures the image. Most devices have CCD sensors but some have CMOS sensors which is produced by a CMOS process and has emerged as an alternative to charge-coupled device (CCD) image sensors leading to better image quality.
PHYSICAL
Lighter130 gvs143 g13 g lighter.
Less body volume75.32 cm³vs87.15 cm³13.57% less body volume.
Shorter136.6 mmvs137.4 mm0.8 mm shorter.
Thinner7.9 mmvs9.3 mm1.4 mm thinner.
Explicitly lower SAR for head (USA)0.85 W/kgvs1.26 W/kg0.41 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
POWER
More battery power2,600 mAhvs2,300 mAh13.04% more battery power.
Has a removable batteryYesvsNoThe battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken
Wireless chargingYesvsNoIt can be charged w/o any plugs and wires similar to electric shavers or toothbrushes (as extra).
DISPLAY
A shade bigger screen size5"vs4.7"6.38% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
CONNECTIVITY
Has an external memory slotYesvsNoThe device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.

Design

Samsung Galaxy S4 – Plastic body, 7.9mm thick, 130g
HTC One – Aluminium and plastic body, 9.3mm thick, 143g

If you were to play a game of mobile phone top trumps, you could easily conclude that the Samsung Galaxy S4 wins in a battle of bods. It’s slimmer and lighter than the HTC One. 

However, in-hand the reality is quite different. The HTC One doesn’t feel particularly heavily – mostly because it isn’t – and the curvy ergonomics of the phone’s rear stop it from feeling remotely chunky. We’re starting to think that Samsung cares a lot more about hardware specs than actual people do.
Versus 6

What sets the HTC One apart from the Samsung Galaxy S4 is its use of aluminium. The whole of the rear is aluminium, giving the cool-to-the-touch feel that’s really the main reason for using metal rather than plastic.
 Versus 2


The Samsung Galaxy S4 feels a lot like its predecessor. It’s impressively slim and light, but the use of a plastic battery cover stops from feeling as flashy, or as hard as an iPhone 5 or HTC One. Ultimately it’s a shallow victory for the HTC as the aluminium used in the phone is just as prone to scratches as the plastic of the Samsung. But it doesn’t half feel great in the hand.

Teardowns of the two phones reveal that, predictably, the Samsung Galaxy S4 is a lot easier to repair than the HTC One. The metal unibody design makes the phone almost impossible to take apart without damage. DIY fixes are not going to be easy with HTC's latest. 



HTC One vs galaxy S4

Internal Speaker

Samsung Galaxy S4 – Mono rear-mounted speaker
HTC One – Dual front-mounted speakers

Like most phone speakers, the Samsung Galaxy S4’s is a simple mono speaker mounted to the rear of the phone. You’ll find its grille on the bottom left, cut into the plastic battery cover. 

Tonally, the Samsung Galaxy S4 speaker isn’t hugely impressive, lacking some of the finesse of a rival mono speaker like the iPhone 5’s. However, it can produce decent volume without sounding too strained. 

HTC put a lot more attention into the One’s internal speakers, making it one of the phone’s key features. There are two drivers, one to each side of the screen. 

When holding the HTC One in landscape orientation, it’ll supply a decent stereo image, as each speaker is roughly pointed at each of your ears. Few phones pay as much attention to speakers. 

The tone of the HTC One speakers isn’t miraculous, but they are a cut above, and provide good volume without distorting. This is a clear with for HTC. 
HTC One vs galaxy S4

Screen

Samsung Galaxy S4 – 5-inch, 1080p resolution, Super AMOLED
HTC One – 4.7-inch, 1080p resolution, IPS

Is bigger always better? The HTC One has a slightly smaller display than the Samsung Galaxy S4, with 4.7 inches instead of five. 

As a result, the Samsung Galaxy S4 is a teeny bit wider – around 1.5mm - than the HTC One. The difference is so small because Samsung aggressively slimmed-down the phone’s screen bezel.Versus 5


There remain some minor handling benefits to the HTC One, thanks to the smaller screen.

Both phones use a 1080p-resolution screen panel, offering supremely sharp text and images. The HTC One’s pixel density is slightly higher, but with both phones offering 400-plus pixels per inch, looking too deep into pixel density is pointless.
Versus 8

A keen eye might just be able to see the HTC One is a bit sharper, but it’s not just down to the resolution. It’s also the type of panel used. 

The HTC One uses an IPS screen, much like that of the iPhone 5. The Samsung Galaxy S4, like its predecessors, has an AMOLED-type screen. 

Most AMOLED screens, including the Galaxy S4’s, use a pixel sub-arran called PenTile. This is not as regular as the RBG arrangement found in most LCD screens, reducing sharpness slightly. There are so many pixels to go around here that it’s a trifling problem - when reviewing the phon we didn't notice any lack of sharpness whatsoever.

However, we do still prefer the look of IPS displays. AMOLED screens have a tendency to oversaturate colours, giving an unnatural look to images. 

Samsung offers colour temperature modes that cool down the colours a little, but we still prefer the natural colours and super-bright maximum setting of the HTC's IPS screen. 


HTC One vs galaxy S4 4

Storage

Samsung Galaxy S4 – 16-64GB of storage, microSD slot
HTC One – 32/64GB internal memory, no memory card slot 

So far the HTC One has won a few points, but Samsung strikes back with storage. One of the reasons why the Galaxy series has won so many geek points over the years is it continued inclusion of a microSD memory card slot. This makes it tremendously easy and cheap to upgrade storage. 


The HTC One sacrifices the memory card slot for a unibody design. You have no access to the phone’s internals with this mobile. It’s available with 32GB of internal memory in the UK. 

Expandable memory is something to consider pretty seriously if you want to use your phone as your main music player, or as a portable video buddy. 32GB will soon run out when put to these uses – especially as Android chomps-up some of the 32GB
HTC One vs galaxy S4 2

CPU and Power

Samsung Galaxy S4 – 1.9GHz Exynos octa-Core / quad-core Snapdragon 600, 2GB RAM
HTC One – 1.7GHz quad-core Snapdragon 600, 2GB RAM



However, it is one of the most powerful – if not the most powerful – phone around. The UK edition of the Samsung Galaxy S4 has a 1.9GHz quad-core Qualcomm APQ8064T Snapdragon 600 CPU, based on the Krait architecture. This is paired with 2GB of RAM.

Galaxy S4 comparison

The HTC uses a processor from the same family, but it is clocked slightly slower – at 1.7GHz instead of 1.9GHz. It too has 2GB of RAM. And both phones use the Adreno 320 graphics chip.

You might assume that the difference between the two would be slight, but benchmarks do show a pretty big gap. In the Sunspider java test – which shows how fast a phone can render web pages  - the Galaxy S4 trounces the poor old HTC One. In the AnTuTu test, a benchmark that’s a pretty good indicator of general performance across all sorts of tasks, it scores a solid 3,000 points more – 10 per cent more. 

Sunspider
(lower scores are better in Sunspider)
AnTuTu
(higher scores are better in AnTuTu)

At this point, there’s not a great deal to challenge either phone – both the Galaxy S4 and HTC One are at the top of their game. However, the extra injection of grunt in the Samsung phone will be handy a year down the line. 

HTC One vs galaxy S4 3

Software

Samsung Galaxy S4 – Android 4.2 with TouchWiz
HTC One – Android 4.1 with HTC Sense 5

Although the Samsung Galaxy S4 will ship with a slightly newer version of Android – 4.2 instead of the HTC One’s 4.1.2 – what’s much more important is the difference between the Samsung custom UI and Sense 5, HTC’s Android interface.  

They demonstrate two different approaches. The Samsung Galaxy S4 wants to pack in as many cool-sounding gadgety features as possible while the HTC One is happy to keep things simple.
Versus 1

The HTC One offers BlinkFeed as its main interface tweak. This is a home screen that shows recent updates including articles, tweets and Facebook updates as tiles, arranged to look slick as they careen down the screen with a flick of your finger. 

HTC has also reworked the look of the interface too, making Sense appear a lot more stark and bold. However, if you like the old Sense look you can revert to that style easily enough. 

Samsung hasn’t really altered the look of the TouchWiz UI of the Galaxy S3 for the 2013 model. However, it has introduced a bunch of new features. These include S Health, Smart Scroll, S Translator and Air Gesture.
Versus 4


S Health is fitness tracker app, Smart Scroll lets you tilt the phone to scroll text, S Translator is a clever translation app and Air Gesture lets you interact with the Galaxy S4 without even touching the screen. Clever, eh? 

The question is – how many of these will you actually use? Whether the interface of the Galaxy S4 is actually better than Sense 5 is largely a case of personal preference. However, we prefer the pared-back style of Sense 5. What do you think?
HTC One vs galaxy S4 4


Camera

Samsung Galaxy S4 – 13-megapixel BSI sensor with LED flash, 2MP user-facing sensor
HTC One – 4-megapixel UltraPixel sensor with LED flash, 2.1MP user-facing sensor

The argument with camera tech is curiously similar. The Samsung Galaxy S4 tries to impress with its abundance of features, while the HTC one uses a more stripped-back approach.

First comes the differences in sensors. The Galaxy S4 has a 13-megapixel sensor, while the HTC one has a 4-mepapixel sensor.
Versus 7Versus 3


The sensors are roughly the same size, though, meaning that the HTC One’s sensor pixels can be a good deal larger. Larger sensor pixels means more light can be reaped per pixel within the same exposure time. You guessed it – better low-light performance is what results.

However, in dazzling sunlight, the Samsung Galaxy S4 will be able to recreate finer details – particularly visible when you zoom in.

Detail

Photo comparison 2


The zoomed-out views of the London skyline show that both cameras produce punchy, high contrast photos in good lighting. However, note the different colour reporoduction and exposure levels of the left side of the sky. There's a slightly odd green hue to the HTC One's photo, and some parts of some clouds are clearly overexposed. 

There are no clearly overexposed areas in the Samsung Galaxy S4 photo. 
Photo comparison


At pixel level (these are exact pixel crops), the difference between the two sensors is dramatically clear. There's much less information in an HTC One photo, and while the HTC phone produces a decent amount of detail for its resolution, four megapixels just can't compete with 13. 

Photo comparison 3Macro

Both the focal length and the sensor resolution of these phones affected macro performance. Macro photography is all about reaping as much detail as possile from a close-up object.

Today's test suject is a cuddly toy of the character Om Nom, from mobile game series Cut the Rope. 

The photos below are of the cuddly's right leg.Photo comparison 4
Samsung Galaxy S4

Photo comparison 5
HTC One 

The HTC struggled to focus as close-up as the Samsung, and even when in focus, the level of detail captured was significantly lower. 

We should point out that this is a particularly tricky setup for these cameras as lighting was the limited indoors type rather than the dazzling sunshine of your typical flower/leaf macro test.

HDR Mode


Photo comparison 1


HDR stands for high dynamic range and melds multiple exposures to get the most detail out of a scene as possible - both increasing image information in dark/shadow areas and getting rid of overexposed areas. 

Both phones perform pretty well here. However, look to the left of the HTC One's sky and the clouds appear quite closed to becoming overexposed. The expsoure of the Samsung shot is more even.

Low light


Photo comparison 6

So far the Samsung has triumphed over the HTC camera. However, it wins back many points in the low light test. The whole point of the "UltraPixel" sensor of the HTC One is to improve low light performance. 

And it works. The HTC shot is much less noisy, much clearer and more detailed than the Samsung photo. 

Where the edges of object are barely discernable in the Galaxy S4 photo, they're obvious in the HTC One shot. 

Interface

The Samsung Galaxy S4 offers a snazzy camera interface based on that of the Galaxy Camera, where modes are picked using an animated 3D "dial". 

The HTC One’s interface is rather more standard, but it does offer an eye-catching feature in Zoe mode. This is a mode that captures a short video clip along with a still, which can then be weaved into a 30-second clip to share online. 

Which is better? Each claims a win in a certain set of conditions. The Samsung Galaxy S4 can produce much better photos in the right conditions, but thanks to its low-light performance the HTC One is a little more versatile. 

HTC One vs galaxy S4 3 

Verdict

The battle between the Samsung Galaxy S4 and HTC One is a close and fierce fight. The same flexibility benefits that made the previous Galaxy S phones come out on top apply in this new phone, but the superbly well-made aluminium body of the HTC One and its better-looking software win it some serious points. 

The strong “tilt factor” of the HTC One sees it take the lead, but it’s a marginal one.